Many people win writing awards and gain a large hard cash income, year after year. How do they do it? They really know what judges of writing competitions look for.Just about all writing award schemes, if well judged, will have rigorous conditions for comparing entries. Many competitions publish their criteria, a few don’t. But if they don’t, how do you know what judges are seeking?Here are the three most crucial points that contest judges generally look for at the start.
Bear in mind: all judges are individuals, as are literary agents and publishers’ readers. An entry that wafts one judge into a rhapsody of incoherent delight will leave another cold. That’s exactly why a respectable contest will have a rating scheme set up.A system is necessary – not so much in detecting an outright winner (the quality of a superb entry typically speaks for itself), but in helping to make fine decisions between, for example, the winner of a third award and a secondary award. (It also lessens the chance of judges coming to blows.)
A ‘perfect’ story will often have a total score of 30 points. The top three prize winners commonly rate in the range of 25-30 points while the ten near-top winners typically fall into the 20-25 points bracket.True, there is still room for private judgement. Each judge will award somewhat different – occasionally completely different – points in each category. That’s precisely why a story that flops in a single competition could go on to gain first prize in another.
